Current:Home > ContactHow did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown -EliteFunds
How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
View
Date:2025-04-12 12:59:26
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the Biden administration does not have the authority to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in student debt.
The decision denies relief to about 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt erased by the plan using the HEROES Act.
There were actually two student loan forgiveness decisions made on Friday: The first was about whether two private citizens had the right to challenge the plan. The court unanimously said that the pair did not have standing, and their challenge was thrown out.
- Read the full text of the decision
However, in the case where the decision to strike down the forgiveness plan was made, the court said that Missouri — one of six states that challenged the plan — did have legal standing. This allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education could use the HEROES Act to forgive student loan debt.
Here's how the court voted on that case.
Supreme Court justices who voted against student loan forgiveness
The Supreme Court's decision fell along ideological lines, much like Thursday's decision to end race-based affirmative action.
Chief Justice John Roberts voted against the student loan forgiveness plan and delivered the majority opinion, saying that U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has the authority to "waive or modify" the HEROES Act, but not "rewrite that statute from the ground up."
"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancellation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver—it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically. It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes 'effectively the introduction of a whole new regime,'" Roberts wrote.
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with Roberts.
Barrett filed a concurring opinion, writing that the court "can uphold the Secretary of Education's loan cancellation program only if he points to 'clear congressional authorization' for it."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold student loan forgiveness
The court's three liberal voices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all opposed the decision. Kagan filed a dissent where she called the decision to take up the case, let alone vote on it, an "overreach."
"The plaintiffs in this case are six States that have no personal stake in the Secretary's loan forgiveness plan," Kagan wrote. "They are classic ideological plaintiffs: They think the plan a very bad idea, but they are no worse off because the Secretary differs. In giving those States a forum — in adjudicating their complaint — the Court forgets its proper role. The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies."
In the dissent, Kagan wrote that Cardona acted within the "broad authority" provided by the HEROES Act, saying that the decision to alter usual rules "fits comfortably within" the parameters set by the statute.
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Clarence Thomas
- Student Debt
- Student Loan
- Student Loans
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Miguel Cardona
- John Roberts
Kerry Breen is a news editor and reporter for CBS News. Her reporting focuses on current events, breaking news and substance use.
veryGood! (94628)
Related
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Social media influencer Kai Cenat faces charges of inciting riot after thousands cause mayhem in NYC
- Mark Zuckerberg Reveals He Eats 4,000 Calories Per Day
- Megan Rapinoe, Sue Bird and More Athlete Romances Worth Cheering For
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Niger’s junta isn’t backing down, and a regional force prepares to intervene. Here’s what to expect
- Fire devastated this NYC Chinatown bookshop — community has rushed to its aid
- Buck Showalter makes Baltimore return amid Mets' mess: 'Game will knock you to your knees'
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- US and Sweden meet again in a Women’s World Cup match that will eliminate either Rapinoe or Seger
Ranking
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Philippine military condemns Chinese coast guard’s use of water cannon on its boat in disputed sea
- 'Regression to the mean' USWNT's recent struggles are no predictor of game vs. Sweden
- What is heatstroke? Symptoms and treatment for this deadly heat-related illness
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Deion Sanders makes sly remark about Oregon, college football realignment
- Teen charged in fatal after-hours stabbing outside Connecticut elementary school
- Wells Fargo customers report missing deposits to their bank accounts
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Jamie Foxx Issues Apology to Jewish Community Over Controversial Post
Ukrainians move to North Dakota for oil field jobs to help families facing war back home
New York City high school student charged with hate-motivated murder in killing of gay dancer
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
$50 an hour to wait in line? How Trump's arraignment became a windfall for line-sitting gig workers
Florida shooting puts 2 officers in the hospital in critical condition, police chief says
Katy Perry Reveals Why She Hasn't Released New Music Since Welcoming Daughter Daisy Dove