Current:Home > MyArizona man seeks dismissal of charge over online post after deadly attack in Australia -EliteFunds
Arizona man seeks dismissal of charge over online post after deadly attack in Australia
View
Date:2025-04-17 13:47:04
PHOENIX (AP) — An Arizona man is asking a U.S. court to dismiss a charge of making threatening online comments toward law enforcement days after participating in an online exchange with people who had carried out a deadly attack in Australia.
A lawyer for Donald Day Jr. of Heber, Arizona, said in a filing Tuesday that the two counts of interstate threats against his client should be thrown out because the indictment doesn’t allege that Day made statements of intent to harm any specific person.
Mark Rumold, who represents Day, also said Day’s online comments were not serious expressions of an intent to carry out violence and instead were protected speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Phoenix, which is prosecuting Day, declined to comment Thursday on the dismissal request.
Six people were killed in the attack in Australia in the rural community of Wieambilla on Dec. 12, 2022, investigators said. Two Queensland state police officers and a bystander were fatally shot by Gareth Train, his brother Nathaniel Train and Nathaniel’s wife, Stacey Train, in an ambush at the Trains’ remote property.
Officers went to the property to investigate reports of a missing person. Police killed the three Trains, who have been described as conspiracy theorists, during the six-hour siege. Police described it as a religiously motivated attack.
Gareth Train began following Day on YouTube in May 2020. A year later, they were communicating directly.
Day, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges in Arizona, is now jailed while he awaits trial after a judge concluded he poses a danger to the community and could flee from authorities.
The indictment issued in late November alleged Day had “engaged in a course of conduct demonstrating a desire to incite violence and threaten a variety of groups and individuals including law enforcement and government authorities” from the beginning of 2022 until February 2023.
Prosecutors said in the indictment that Day made comments in response to a video posted by two of the people who had killed the officers in Australia and said “if you don’t defend yourself against these devils and demons, you’re a coward.” The video was posted after the killings.
In his post, Day said he wished he could have been there with them and profanely said “that those bastards will regret that they ever” messed with them. Four days later, Day posted a video in which he said two of the people who carried out the violence against the officers did what they had to do because they would not submit “to a monster, to an unlawful entity, to a demonic entity.”
Day’s attorney said the charges against his client should be dismissed because neither involves a threat to a “natural person” or alleges a “true threat.”
In one count, Day is accused of making threats four days after the killings in Australia to injure any law enforcement official who would come to Day’s home in eastern Arizona, about 145 miles (233 kilometers) miles from Phoenix. Rumold wrote that it was impossible to determine whether Day was threatening any particular person when he wrote that “the devils (who) come for us” will die.
On the other count, Day is accused of making online threats in 2023 to injure a person whose full identity isn’t provided in the indictment, though Day’s attorney said that person was Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization. Rumold disputed that Day’s comments about the WHO official can be classified as “true threats” as a matter of law.
veryGood! (3685)
Related
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- 'Backyard Sports' returns: 5 sports video games we'd love to see return next
- Judge rejects GOP call to give Wisconsin youth prison counselors more freedom to punish inmates
- Georgia counties urge state elections board to stop changing rules ahead of November
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Pumpkin Spice Latte officially back at Starbucks this week: Plus, a new apple-flavored drink
- 48 hours with Usher: Concert preparation, family time and what's next for the R&B icon
- Grapefruit-sized hail? Climate change could bring giant ice stones
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Babysitter set to accept deal for the 2019 death of a man she allegedly injured as a baby in 1984
Ranking
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- FAA sent 43 more cases of unruly airline passengers to the FBI for possible prosecution
- It's Al Roker's 70th birthday, and he got this advice from Oprah Winfrey
- ESPN tabs Mike Greenberg as Sam Ponder's replacement for 'NFL Sunday Countdown' show
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- KARD on taking a refined approach to new album: 'We chose to show our maturity'
- Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck Break Up, File for Divorce After 2 Years of Marriage
- Gov. Jim Justice tries to halt foreclosure of his West Virginia hotel as he runs for US Senate
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
The Meaning Behind the Date Jennifer Lopez Filed for Divorce From Ben Affleck
All the Signs Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Were Headed for a Split
Hoda Kotb Shares Dating Experience That Made Her Stop Being a “Fixer”
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Nordstrom Rack Top 100 Deals: Score $148 Jeans for $40 & Save Up to 73% on Cotopaxi, Steve Madden & More
Propane blast levels Pennsylvania home, kills woman and injures man
Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck Split: Look Back at Their Great Love Story