Current:Home > MarketsIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -EliteFunds
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 17:57:53
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (781)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Average rate on 30
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Could your smelly farts help science?
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
'Most Whopper
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest